Data Donation in University Student Samples: A Predictive Study of Public Health Apps
Health Technology and Social Research, Volume 1, Issue 2, 2026 cover
PDF

Keywords

Data Donation
Public Health Applications
Registry Analysis
University Students
Public Health Apps

Abstract

The rapid evolution of mobile health applications has generated an unprecedented volume of person-generated health data, offering significant potential for public health surveillance and epidemiological research. However, leveraging this data requires active participation from users through data donation. This study investigates the factors influencing data donation behaviors among university students using a custom-built, secure registry system. Drawing on a cohort of eight hundred and forty university students, we integrated self-reported psychometric survey data with objective system logs tracking actual data donation decisions. Our findings indicate a profound divergence between stated behavioral intentions and actual donation actions, illustrating the privacy paradox in a digital health context. Logistic regression models reveal that institutional trust and altruistic tendencies are strong positive predictors of objective data donation, whereas perceived privacy risks act as a substantial barrier. Conversely, digital health literacy and app usage frequency showed marginal significance in predicting actual donation behavior. By demonstrating the efficacy of registry analysis to monitor real-time, behavioral outcomes, this paper contributes a novel methodological framework to digital health research. The results highlight the critical necessity of establishing transparent data governance protocols and user-centric registry interfaces to foster public trust and cultivate sustainable digital donation ecosystems for public health advancements.
PDF

References

1. Xie, M.; Pan, W. Opportunities and Challenges of Digital Twin Applications in Modular Integrated Construction. In Proceedings of the 37th International Symposium on Automation and Robotics in Construction (ISARC), Kitakyushu, Japan, 27–28 October 2020; Hisashi, O., Hiroshi, F., Kazuyoshi, T., Eds.; International Association for Automation and Robotics in Construction (IAARC): Philadelphia, PA, USA, 2020; pp. 278–284.

2. Azanaw, G.M. Revolutionizing Structural Engineering: A Review of Digital Twins, BIM, and AI Applications. Indian J. Struct. Eng. 2024, 4, 1–8.

3. Fereday, J.; Muir-Cochrane, E. Demonstrating Rigor Using Thematic Analysis: A Hybrid Approach of Inductive and Deductive Coding and Theme Development. Int. J. Qual. Methods 2006, 5, 80–92.

4. Ariza Dau, M., Vega, L. M., Pimiento, D. T., García, M. G., & Passo, J. C. M. (2023). Human capital and business growth of the startups: An approach to the state of the art. Salud, Ciencia y Tecnología—Serie de Conferencias, 2, 362.

5. Tischendorf, T.; Hasseler, M.; Schaal, T.; Ruppert, S.-N.; Marchwacka, M.; Heitmann-Möller, A.; Schaffrin, S. Developing Digital Competencies of Nursing Professionals in Continuing Education and Training—A Scoping Review. Front. Med. 2024, 11, 1358398.

6. Kim, K.; Shin, S.; Kim, S.; Lee, E. The Relation Between eHealth Literacy and Health-Related Behaviors: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. J. Med. Internet Res. 2023, 25, e40778.

7. Guerra, J. G. (2019). Algunas ideas sobre startups: ¿Superar el dilema de ‘personalización vs. coste’ de la medicina de precisión? Revista de Gestión y Salud, 10(2), 261–275.

8. Peters, M.D.J.; Casey, M.; Tricco, A.C.; Pollock, D.; Munn, Z.; Alexander, L.; McInerney, P.; Godfrey, C.M.; Khalil, H. Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews. JBI Evid. Synth. 2020, 18, 2119–2126.

9. Luz, S.; Nogueira, P.; Costa, A.; Henriques, A. Psychometric analysis of the eHealth Literacy Scale in Portuguese older adults (eHEALS-PT24): Instrument development and validation. J. Med. Internet Res. 2025, 27, e57730.

10. Chung, S.; Nahm, E. Testing reliability and validity of the ehealth literacy scale (eHEALS) for older adults recruited online. Comput. Inform. Nurs. 2015, 33, 150–156.

11. Kleib, M.; Arnaert, A.; Nagle, L.M.; Ali, S.; Idrees, S.; Costa, D.D.; Kennedy, M.; Darko, E.M. Digital Health Education and Training for Undergraduate and Graduate Nursing Students: Scoping Review. JMIR Nurs. 2024, 7, e58170.

12. Sandelowski, M. Whatever Happened to Qualitative Description? Res. Nurs. Health 2000, 23, 334–340.

13. Munhall, P.L. Nursing Research: A Qualitative Perspective, 5th ed.; Jones & Bartlett Learning: Sudbury, MA, USA, 2012.

14. Braun, V.; Clarke, V. Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology. Qual. Res. Psychol. 2006, 3, 77–101.

15. Steen, O.D.; Ori, A.P.S.; Wardenaar, K.J.; van Loo, H.M. Loneliness associates strongly with anxiety and depression during the COVID pandemic, especially in men and younger adults. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 9517.

16. Novo, R.F.; Duarte-Silva, M.E.; Peralta, E. O bem-estar psicológico em adultos: Estudo das características psicométricas da versão portuguesa das escalas de C. Ryff. In Avaliação Psicológica: Formas e Contextos; Gonçalves, M., Ribeiro, I., Araújo, S., Machado, C., Almeida, L., Simões, M., Eds.; Associação dos Psicólogos Portugueses: Braga, Portugal, 1997; Volume V, pp. 313–324.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2026 Authors